That we move in herds is evident all around us: in business, in the consumer world and particularly in investing.
But why does herding happen? And why do herds often form on the basis of such little information? Why do herds form even when that information might be wrong?
The answers to these questions can be found in something called ‘social proof’.
Social proof is when people follow the actions of others in an attempt to reflect the “correct” behaviour for a given situation. This urge to conform to established patterns or to follow the lead of perceived authority figures, trendsetters or simply people “in the know” is the social glue that binds people into a herd.
In many aspects of life, this tendency to conform and follow is beneficial. In fact, social proof is one of the key human traits that underpinned our evolutionary move to a community-based civilisation – the impulse to act like others in the tribe would have been powerful for millennia.
It follows that social proof is cumulative and has a self-reinforcing momentum – as the effect ripples out across a larger number of people, the size of the herd will multiply, encouraging more people to confirm the assumption that this must be the right way to act.
The best-known experiment that showed the concept of social proof was carried out in 1935 by Muzafer Sherif. He put people into a darkroom and showed them a dot of light several feet away. In reality, the dot was not moving but, due to the auto-kinetic effect, it appeared to move to individuals, by different degrees.
When asked individually, and then in groups, how much it moved, individuals deferred to the group estimate even when it was out of line with their experience. This showed that the participants were relying on each other to define a group-informed “reality”.
The evidence suggests that the social proof bias is amplified in complex situations, where the “right way” to act is ambiguous, yet the importance of being accurate is critical. We make the the assumption that the people around us possess more knowledge about the complex situation.
So we can see that investing provides the perfect conditions for social proof to operate in an exaggerated way – and this gives to the herd behaviour that can drive bubbles and bursts.
When stock markets are falling, there is an aversion to loss. But even more significant is the pull on our emotions as social proof encourages an urge to sell, when we see others doing so. Why are others selling? Do they know something we don’t? The evidence from behavioural finance suggests the answers to these questions could be surprisingly irrational – that people sell because others are selling!
In the long run, stock prices tend to reflect the intrinsic value of companies.But in the short-term, the stock market is often a barometer of changing investor sentiment and a reflection of the average view of the players in the market at that moment. And who would aspire to follow the average investor?
The evidence suggests that some investors – the Chinese in particular – are more short term than others. We know that stock-market participation has broadened significantly in China in recent years as many individuals have opened trading accounts. While institutions still own most of the market, data suggests these small investors can account for as much as 80% of daily trading on the domestic Chinese exchanges.
This raises the possibility that falls in the Chinese stock markets, triggered by short-termist investors, can trigger sympathetic falls in other markets via social proof and herding. In today’s synchronised world, it seems like only the first domino need falter to set off a sentimental chain reaction.
Another interesting dynamic to consider is whether there may be large forced sellers in the market. These may or may not be “trend-setters” worth following, yet their large influence on the market could nevertheless trigger trend-following behaviour.
The sovereign wealth funds of large exporters and oil-producing countries, for example, have accumulated large holdings of stocks in recent years. If an oil-producing nation were to sell stocks held in these funds to raise cash due to the hit a lower oil price is having on the government’s fiscal position, and that is instrumental in setting off a decline in stock markets, should investors around the world become nervous? Possibly, but then again perhaps these are investors who are exposed to companies who benefit from a lower oil price?
So what does this all mean?
Certainly, it seems like social proof can trigger and exaggerate herd behaviour in the absence of rational drivers. Fortunately, there are natural limits to directional herd behaviour, as trends fizzle out and sellers become exhausted. At some point, when the gloom is felt to be overdone, a new trendsetter often emerges – the value-driven investor – who may kick off a new herd behaviour that acts in the opposite direction to encourage a rally in stocks.
With all these mini trends and trend-reversals, the job of keeping up with them is nigh-on impossible – the trading costs would also be onerous.
It is little wonder then, that successful investors all agree on one thing – the benefit of taking a longer-term view!
Source Reproduced with permission of Fidelity Australia This document has been prepared without taking into account your objectives, financial situation or needs. You should consider these matters before acting on the information. You should also consider the relevant Product Disclosure Statements (“PDS”) for any Fidelity Australia product mentioned in this document before making any decision about whether to acquire the product. The PDS can be obtained by contacting Fidelity Australia on 1800 119 270 or by downloading it from our website at www.fidelity.com.au. This document may include general commentary on market activity, sector trends or other broad-based economic or political conditions that should not be taken as investment advice. Information stated herein about specific securities is subject to change. Any reference to specific securities should not be taken as a recommendation to buy, sell or hold these securities. While the information contained in this document has been prepared with reasonable care, no responsibility or liability is accepted for any errors or omissions or misstatements however caused. This document is intended as general information only. The document may not be reproduced or transmitted without prior written permission of Fidelity Australia. The issuer of Fidelity Australia’s managed investment schemes is FIL Responsible Entity (Australia) Limited ABN 33 148 059 009. Reference to ($) are in Australian dollars unless stated otherwise.
© 2016. FIL Responsible Entity (Australia) Limited.